The Bob Knowlton Case Study Essay Example for Free

The pier Knowlton Case Study EssaySummaryBob Knowlton is the motion of the Photon Lab when a new member, Simon suppurate, was introduced to his lab. He begins to feel inferior to his new member and feels that he can non utter his concerns to his prime(prenominal), Dr. Jerold. After a period of events and insecurities, he finds a better position with more salary and takes the labor immediately. Dr, Jerrold and exhaust were shocked by Knowltons decision. The lab took a large hit as Fester went on to clobber on an some other project as planned. No one knew that Knowlton wanted to founder as he did so very suddenly citing fictional personal problems.Analyze the roles of those involvedThe important characters in the Bob Knowlton case wereBob Knowlton the group draw of Photon Lab collaborative team drawer hard working man confidence easily wavered by insecurities does not phonate out problemsDr. Jerrold the executive program of Bob Knowlton and his team has very high ex pectations of those working under her not observant no instinctual experienceSimon Fester a new comer to the company and Photon Lab confident aggressive competitive self-seeker highly intelligent non paticipativeDiscuss the reasons as to why what happened happened.The bringing in the newcomerBob Knowlton was endanger by the newcomer that was not properly introduced to him Fester just showed up without warning and began looking into thingsDr. Jerold did not introduce Fester did not even for mention or hint at Knowlton for possibly having person new join his teamSimon Fester lacked tact and the human touch was too confident and unequivocal to accept the way people do things and embrace itThe talk breakdownBob Knowlton did not voice his queries or insecurities simply assumed that Fester was at that place to replace him did not consider speaking to his supervisor regarding his problem and started looking for another job insteadDr. Jerold did not indicate that Festers place in Kn owltons team was temporary did not give earlier warning regarding Festers transfer to another project did not advert any intentions of caring for Knowltons well beingSimon Fester too much of an opportunist to work in a team with others did not heed the advice of whom was rightfully his team leader remained individualistic and closed impinge on to the team until he left to work for another projectConsider the personalities involved, especially those of Knowlton and Fester, and the organizational characteristics.Bob Knowlton was more of an introvert. He did not share his feelings,opinions and conflicts with his team mates, Fester or Jerold. He lacked also lacked of steady of communication skills. He did not know how to voice his concerns to Jerold or properly inform an guide Fester on his responsibilities in the team, which lead to Fester doing his own thing most of the time, without consulting with others.Simon Fester on the other hand was someone very self involved and confide nt. He had no qualms speaking clear-cutly of his ideas and what he wanted to do. Fester was also aggressive in his approach. He did not care for group work and was more individualistic, even to the point of making others feel inferior.Organizational characteristicWork GroupKnowlton had fix morning meetings with his members as a way to keep up to date of what was going on in the project, and discuss problems faced. However, Fester took over some of these meetings plastering himself as the team leader, and spear heading discussions, undermining Knowltons self-confidence and the intelligence of the team at many an occasion.Open SystemJerrold and Knowlton shared a mostly open relationship, Knowlton even mentioned that he enjoyed Jerold coming over to talk to him at the end ofthe day. However, Knowlton did not share his problems with his superior when he had the chance of voicing them mainly when he felt threatened by Festers place in the team.Imagine yourself in the position of Dr. J errold at the end of the case, reflecting back over the events. Is there anything you could have done, on the basis of what you knew or could have known at the time, that would have led to a more favorable outcome? State your reasoning.Dr.Jerrold could have utilized a better interpersonal communication skill.Had she made clear that she was going to hire Simon Fester and taken into consideration Bob Knowltons personality, explaining her intentions to train him to lead another project, things major power have worked out very differently. Knowlton could have been less insecure regarding his position and would likely been more willing to overlook Festers lone ranger tendencies.Had Dr. Jerrold utilized interpersonal communication with Simon Fester as well, ensuring that Fester should try to work under the conditions laid out by his team leader, Fester might have better understood where he stood within the team and made more of an effort to be a team player as intelligent or talented as he whitethorn be.Dr. Jerrold could have also been more involved with the meetings, and taken an initiative to ensure that all employees were happy and satisfied.