The Italian and English Legal Systems Essay -- Law

discriminatory trunks have been used pre paramountly throughout the world to address disputes in various contexts, where accused twists, to law enforcement officers and expert witnesses take part on a daily groundwork to resolve deputes in judicial trend (Silverman et al 2010). However, characteristics of the judicial constitutions differ from country/region to another, depending on the basis of the system which may cause an impact on the expert witness. As an explanation for the above statement, it could be said that legal systems fall into 2 systems, the adversarial system and the inquisitorial system. Conversely, a hybrid between those cardinal systems has make yet another system which is identified as the mixed system. These deign from historical law and judicial practices which have been practiced for a gigantic amount of time, which eventually improved and standardised. Debara.K in 2002 suggested that the foundation to form a jury was based on medieval trail modes o f combat where two parties argue their points to crown a champion. Jonakait (2008) concluded that by the 18th century, the legal systems developed into a stage where lawyers actively participated in English wicked trials making the legal system more Adversary. Paradoxically, inquisitorial system was born right after the 13th century, as a bequeath of disbelief upon the adversarial system. Essentially, this system was formed by the French and then was horizontally transferred into few more countries which ultimately become one of the two dominant legal systems in the world (Johnson.Het al 2008).In this short study, English legal system will be elaborated in compare to the Italian Legal system. Prior to that, both adversarial and inquisitorial systems shall be discusse... ...and Jones, M. (2008) explanation of criminal justice,4th ed. Waltham Elsevier, p.67-70.Jonakait, R. (2008) The rise of the American adversary system America in front England, Widner Law review, 14(1), p.656 .Koppen, J. and Penrod, S. (2003) Adversarial versus inquisitorial justice psychological perspective on criminal justice systems, USA Springer, p.29.Malleson, K. (2007) the legal system, New York Oxford University press, p.11-14.Siegal, L. (2010) Criminology The core, USA Cengage learning, p.385-387.Silverman, J. and Silverman, S. (2010) how the judicial system works, UK A Discovery company, p.27.Smith, S. and Langan, B. (1992) Civil jury cases and verdict in tremendous countries, Burean of Justice statistics, - (1), p.3-10.Wall, W. (2010) Forensic Science in courts the role of the expert witness, air jacket Sussex John Wiley and Sons, p.2-56.