Ehe novel by Charles Dickens Essay

The most predominant theme in the two poesys is that of sheer desperation. The notion of hope and hopelessness is effectively conveyed, representing the poets anger at the absence of democracy and equanimity in society. They conflict to restrain this frustration towards the step uprageous policy-making and social racism make against ethnic minorities in the way they have been. However, thematicall(a)y, the way the loaded bridge player with the unjust and prejudiced policies installed into society differs greatly mingled with the poems.In cryptographs Changed the poet returns to the wasteland that was at once his home, and relives the anger he felt when the playing area was first destroyed. When confronted with the new hotels and the restaurants, which are surrounded by the poverty and scurvy his deep content forces him to want to destroy the restaurant with a infernal region or a run out. This makes him reflect that despite the changing political situation, on that po int are silent huge inequalities between blacks and whites. nonhings changed.Therefore, the subdued message in Nothings Changed is the Whereas, in Not my vocation a different message is conveyed, as in the outgrowth stanzas Osundare sits back, grateful he is safe, as those around him are taken away. Eventually, he too is taken away and the reader is left with the distressing and uninspiring ending. The poem runs parallel to a quote which came through from the most annihilative human conflict in history, World War Two, Edmund Burke once said that all that is needed for evil to triumph is for good hands to do zipper. This concept is particularly relevant in the poem and reflects the general theme of it, the way Osundare is allowing the governing body to act, rather than protesting. Similarly, both poems have a memorable blend in line. Afrika writes Nothings Changed for his last line and beca usage the last line and the title are the analogous, a cycle is suggested, that sim ply nothings changed, and never go out. It also suggests that he is returning to district sise after(prenominal) his campaigning, and finds despite the removal of all the whites only signs, the town is unflurried filled with prejudice. In Not my business.The theme of social division and the poets thoughts on them is a clear one throughout all the poems. In Nothings Changed, Tatamkhulu Afrika comments on how even though district half a dozen has ended its apartheid, people are still prejudiced towards black people, when he writes whites only inn. No sign says it is but we know where we belong Afrika develops a sense of desperation and longing for a place or standard society. He is desperate for district six before the apartheid, when people of all races and beliefs lived peacefully, as he says No board says it is but my feet know.He finds himself longing for the past, when he was a member of the African National Congress, flake against apartheid. The anger of the poet comes th rough as he reflects on his childhood, his hands write out for a stone, a bomb, to shiver down the glass of the Inn, as he did when he was younger. All three poems compare two ways of life. In Nothings Changed, Afrika compares his life with the ANC, fighting for equal rights, to his life now, after his victory, where prejudice still remains.Furthermore, through consistency and regulation in the structure the poets reflect the relentlessness of governance governing and ongoing racial attitudes. Despite the morally unjust and unsubstantiated discrimination which still exists, there are no tell ons in the poems and this represents the way racism has become plant into society and peoples lives, so much so that the poets gather in no reason to stop the fluency of the poem because of it.On the separate hand, this consistency in the structure could relate to the emotional state of the poet and their reception to the injustices progressing in the poem. In Nothings Changed the struct ure appears regulated, implying the poet is managing to keep his emotions in check and accept the racism in South Africa. However, within the stanzas there are irregular line breaks and punctuation giving the poem a sense of choppiness, suggesting there are internal issues which the poet is struggling to check as the poem becomes progressively unfair.These line breaks and irregularities may, alternatively, symbolise the way that the government claim to have ended the apartheid and it appears over, however there are still underlying issues which exist in society. In addition, the punctuation creates speed and thence tension, which creates a sense of ambiguity the regularity of the stanza construction, evoking the concept of detached rationalism, distinguish with the wildly fluctuating line length, suggesting that the poet is struggling to contain his emotion.This structure successfully encapsulates the interior conflicts existing in South Africa. Whereas, In Not my business the s tanzas appear regular to represent the implacable government regime, inflicted on the oppressed peoples. The repetition of the sentence lengths and stanzas implies that, despite the death and kidnapping, the poet does not see it grave enough to break the consistent structure. This poignant message optimises the idea of the all poem that if there is not a will to protest, evil will go on and ultimately succeed.Finally, in the last stanza the indented few lines of what business is it of mine? , which seem to have been catching up with the poet throughout, are replaced with a full stop representing finality. Finally, the use of linguistic techniques, most predominantly the use symbolism, is most effective in helping the two poets convey the purposeful and differing messages intended. An important image in Nothings changed is that of the glass which shuts out the speaker in the poem. It is a symbol of the divisions of colour, and class often the same thing in South Africa.As he back s away from it at the end of the poem, Afrika sees himself as a boy again, who has left the form of his small, mean mouth on the glass. He wants a stone, a bomb to break the glass he may wish literally to break the window of this inn, but this is clearly meant in a symbolic sense. He wants to break down the system, which separates white and black, rich and poor, in South Africa. In Not my Business the image of the jeep is effective in personifying the government as threatening and absurd.The jeep is symbolic of the establishment throughout the poem, it appears a like a predator, as it stuffed him down the belly implying they are monstrous and ruthless toward the victims. The government seem like a faceless and achromatic tyrant, who through bribing the people of their yam are enforcing a deadly regime that, much like the Nazi one, sees people taken away randomly, to die. The range and extent of the vocabulary used differs mostly between Not my Business and Nothing Changed. In N othings changed Afrika is real detailed in his description of the wasteland.The purple flowering represents the White world at the beginning of the poem. The purple connotes royalty and class representing their superior dumbfound in society. The flowering implies growth and development, perhaps, socially, the problems getting worse and the racism is beseeming stronger. This juxtaposes the amiable weeds which relates to the Blacks position, the way they are out of place and friendless in society. The Blacks have removed them like an owner of a tend would remove a weed.Moreover, the images in the poem of the wasteland itself, the expensive restaurant, and the working(a) mans cafe are sharply contrasted to create a sense of division, mirroring the division within the country itself and within the poets mind. The terrible difference In Nothings Changed, Afrika says the Inn is flaring like a flag importee it is glaringly bright. Flaring has another meaning spreading gradually o utwards, which is relevant to Afrikas feelings, as the Inns whites only prejudice is spreading throughout district six.