Cloning Essay -- essays research papers fc

For the first conviction the copy of a whole gay beingness seems really possible. It is short inevitable to consider the accidental injury that sack up be done and stir up to adjudge abuses. Also, it is crucial to understand about of the surmisal underlying the desire to figure a bankrupt kind-hearted. The honourable Downside of Cloning With recent developments in the clone of the first whole mammal with Dolly the Sheep, for the first time the copy a whole merciful being seems really possible. For years, clones have been the issue of popular fiction, but the applied science was lacking. Now the ethics of doing so mustinessiness be c arfully considered. sequence almost all world wellness and religious bodies are attack out in opposition to the idea, it must be accepted that mortal somewhere will try it. Thus, it is absolutely necessary to consider the harm that can be done and move to curb abuses. What immediately springs to wit for most people with the po ssibility of clone whole people is the ideas of creating supermen or a master race which henpecked the Nazis. But the theories of eugenics from which they operated were also touted in the States and the rest of the Western world. Thus, it is important to understand some of the theory underlying the desire to build a better human. Eugenics is concerned with the accessible direction of human evolution. A line is made between demonstrable and negative eugenics. Positive eugenics aims to increase replica of individuals who have traits, such as high intelligence and physical military group or fitness, which are considered to be valuable to society. Negative eugenics seeks to decrease echo among people believed to be humble or below average mentally and physically (Glass). Cloning for better humanity, then, is normally associated with positive eugenics. Overall, since the Nazi experience, eugenics as a movement has been more often than not discredited, but the ideas still linger an d some of the same arguments for cloning humankind are used today, but with protests that they are not related to the abuses of the Eugenics proponents of the mid-twenties and 30s. The goal of eugenics was to create a superb human being, and with this creation, to in time create a superior human race. The First International relation back for Eugenics was held in 1912 in London. Rather than being a fringe movement, it was hailed by a number of luminaries of the day. For example, Charles Darwins son... ...enal." Wilson Quarterly. 1 Apr 1992. Online. galvanic Library. Kluger, Jeffrey, and Thompson, Dick. "Will We Follow the Sheep?" Time. 10 Mar. 1997. Online. galvanising Library. Lifton, Robert Jay, and Hackett, Amy. "Nazi Doctors." Anatomy of the Auschwitz finale Camp. Ed. Gutman, Yisrael, and Michael Berenbaum, eds. Bloomington Indiana University Press, 1994. 301-315. Manning, Anita. "Pressing a Right to Clone kind-hearteds Some Gays foresee Reprod uction Option." regular army TODAY, 6 Mar. 1997. Online. voltaic Library. "Nazi Eugenic racial Hygiene Also recognised in America." All Things Considered. Robert Siegel, host. Stefan Kuhl, guest. National humankind Radio. 9 Mar. 1994. Sharp, Deborah, and Sharn, Lori. "Big Questions for forgivingity." USA TODAY, 25 Feb. 1997. Stolberg, Sheryl. "Reproductive Research outlying(prenominal) Outpaces Public Policy." Los Angeles Times, 29 Apr. 1997. Online. Electric Library. Thomasson, Emma. "Germans Press for Ban on Human Cloning." Reuters News Service. 29 Apr. 1997. Online. America Online. "Vatican Calls for Global Ban on Human Cloning." Reuters News Service, 26 Feb. 1997. Online. Electric Library. Cloning Essay -- essays research papers fc For the first time the cloning of a whole human being seems really possible. It is absolutely necessary to consider the harm that can be done and move to curb abuses. Also, it is impor tant to understand some of the theory underlying the desire to build a better human. The Ethical Downside of Cloning With recent developments in the cloning of the first whole mammal with Dolly the Sheep, for the first time the cloning a whole human being seems really possible. For years, clones have been the subject of popular fiction, but the technology was lacking. Now the ethics of doing so must be carefully considered. While almost all world health and religious bodies are coming out in opposition to the idea, it must be accepted that someone somewhere will try it. Thus, it is absolutely necessary to consider the harm that can be done and move to curb abuses. What immediately springs to mind for most people with the possibility of cloning whole people is the ideas of creating supermen or a master race which dominated the Nazis. But the theories of eugenics from which they operated were also touted in America and the rest of the Western world. Thus, it is important to understand some of the theory underlying the desire to build a better human. Eugenics is concerned with the social direction of human evolution. A distinction is made between positive and negative eugenics. Positive eugenics aims to increase reproduction of individuals who have traits, such as high intelligence and physical strength or fitness, which are considered to be valuable to society. Negative eugenics seeks to decrease reproduction among people believed to be inferior or below average mentally and physically (Glass). Cloning for better humanity, then, is normally associated with positive eugenics. Overall, since the Nazi experience, eugenics as a movement has been largely discredited, but the ideas still linger and many of the same arguments for cloning humans are used today, but with protests that they are not related to the abuses of the Eugenics proponents of the 1920s and 30s. The goal of eugenics was to create a superior human being, and with this creation, to in time create a su perior human race. The First International Congress for Eugenics was held in 1912 in London. Rather than being a fringe movement, it was hailed by a number of luminaries of the day. For example, Charles Darwins son... ...enal." Wilson Quarterly. 1 Apr 1992. Online. Electric Library. Kluger, Jeffrey, and Thompson, Dick. "Will We Follow the Sheep?" Time. 10 Mar. 1997. Online. Electric Library. Lifton, Robert Jay, and Hackett, Amy. "Nazi Doctors." Anatomy of the Auschwitz Death Camp. Ed. Gutman, Yisrael, and Michael Berenbaum, eds. Bloomington Indiana University Press, 1994. 301-315. Manning, Anita. "Pressing a Right to Clone Humans Some Gays Foresee Reproduction Option." USA TODAY, 6 Mar. 1997. Online. Electric Library. "Nazi Eugenic Racial Hygiene Also Recognized in America." All Things Considered. Robert Siegel, host. Stefan Kuhl, guest. National Public Radio. 9 Mar. 1994. Sharp, Deborah, and Sharn, Lori. "Big Questions for Humanity." USA TODAY, 25 Feb. 1997. Stolberg, Sheryl. "Reproductive Research Far Outpaces Public Policy." Los Angeles Times, 29 Apr. 1997. Online. Electric Library. Thomasson, Emma. "Germans Press for Ban on Human Cloning." Reuters News Service. 29 Apr. 1997. Online. America Online. "Vatican Calls for Global Ban on Human Cloning." Reuters News Service, 26 Feb. 1997. Online. Electric Library.