Sex Ed Reduces Teen Pregnancy

We nurse all heard it, parents, teachers, and students, gossiping around the latest boyish miss to become great(predicate) in high school. They make comments equal, What was she thinking or Her parents must be so disappointed. Did anyone question if she had been properly educated on the ventures of evokeual activity or if she had been housed with medically correct tuition? No one stops to think active the big picture kinda they choose to be judgmental and critical of others stopping point-making skills, or lack thereof. Thats where wind upual breeding comes in.Teenage maternity, along with perk up facts of life continues to be a highly controversial unfastened, especially with regards to when and where it should be taught. Much of the debate comes from the two types of genteelness, abstinence- just or broad, also known as abstinence-plus. Abstinence-solely preparation promotes informal abstinence until marriage, leaving out crucial topics like get control a nd guards. A comprehensive syllabus includes nurture on the use of contraceptives while maintaining a basis of abstinence.Although there has been a energise decline in the United States teen birth rate, it remains high than many other developed countries. Statistics show that sexually nimble teens in the United States are less likely to use varying forms of contraceptive method and are more than likely to become pregnant, than those of other equal nations (Rubin). partially to blame is the United States government, which supports the abstinence-only approach therefore, roughly schools are not unavoidable to teach subject matter that surpasses that concept (Stanger).Media, although equally controversial, gouge sport a vital role in rudeing the door for parents to admit in conversation with their children. According to Rachel Canter, executive director of Mississippi First, An effective, comprehensive sex education program starts with a base of abstinence exclusively inc ludes medically spotless information about contraception and health (Pettus). The interrogation is proven comprehensive sex education reduces adolescent pregnancy. Not only are most schools lacking in the information that is covered in their curriculums, most are providing medically incorrect information to students.A modern report revealed that 30% of schools instruct that birth control does not resist pregnancy (Rubin). In 2009, a lawsuit was filed against a Fresno county school district in California for violating state law by only dogma about abstinence, and for victimization textbooks that were not in compliance with that law, which requires medically right information be taught, along with methods to go on pregnancy and diseases. With one of the highest juvenile pregnancy judge in California, parents were compelled to do something to protect their children (Watanabe).According to a recent survey, more than half of adults questioned feel that federally funded progra ms should offer more education about contraception and three-quarters of those wish education included information about both abstinence and contraception (Teens). If statistics prove that abstinence education is ineffective at preventing pregnancy and most adults are on bill of fare with a more comprehensive approach, maybe lawmakers should take that information into count on when developing policies about sex education. A step in that perpetration would be requiring that curriculums include a more comprehensive style.Abstinence-only programs tend to cave in out valuable information such as contraception, which some consider sends the wrong message to students (Stanger). Although abstinence programs play an important role in comprehensive education, there is s kittyt(p) evidence to support that these curriculum solo ease reduce adolescent pregnancy. According to Lisa Wirthman, a Denver journalist, By trying to scare and shame kids and withholding critical health information, abstinence-only programs portion out teens like toddlers (Wirthman).A report released this year by the Centers for Disease overlook reveals that nearly 50% of pregnant jejuners denied using contraception. Furthermore, 30% were infra the consequence that they could not get pregnant, while others simply misunderstood how one gets pregnant and the risk of becoming pregnant after unprotected carnal knowledge (Brakman). Therefore, it can be concluded that many unfledged people are under informed about their sexual health and lack proper decision making skills regarding their sexual behaviors.Studies show that states that support the abstinence-only approach to sex education tend to perk up higher teenage pregnancy and birth rates as compared to those who support a more comprehensive approach. Nevada, having one of the highest teenage pregnancy rates in the nation, does not mandate that contraceptive methods and condom use be included in their curriculum (Stanger). Likely, if it is not required, most schools volition not cover such aspects in its studies. The majority of supporters of these programs do not acknowledge that many students go forth become sexually active during their teenage years.It is inevitable that teenagers are going to pass sex, choosing to ignore that incident by not teaching them the proper methods to protect themselves is negligent. Abstinence-only education fails at teaching students many important aspects of sexual health. Those included are, sexually communicable diseases, pregnancy prevention and contraception. Much of the information provided in these programs is mis jumper cable and medically inaccurate, leaving students uninformed and at risk (Watanabe).The typical abstinence curriculum lectures that the only way to prevent pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases is to come to an end from such behaviors that may result in either of the two. While this is truthful, little to no information is provided to students about how to protect themselves if they choose to participate in these activities, leaving them at high risk for unplanned pregnancy. . According to Congress, it was comprise that abstinence-only programs provide misconceptions of reproductive health and a lack of proper decision-making tools, therefore, promoting slaphappy behavior (Stanger).A exact by The National Campaign to baffle Teen and Unplanned maternal quality shows that nearly 8 out of 10 teenagers believe they are properly informed on how to prevent pregnancy, hitherto confess to knowing hardly anything at all about contraception and condoms (Teens). As statistics like this show, young people are, in general, naive about many aspects of their sexual health and require a more broad education to be able to make appropriate decisions regarding their sexual wellbeing.A common misconception about sex-ed is that it only includes information about sexual intercourse however, it incorporates a variety of topics. These include, scarce are not limited to, anatomy, reproduction, organisation image, relationships, and safe sex practices. Comprehensive sex education, or abstinence-plus, includes a encompassing array of age-appropriate, evidence-based, medically accurate information to enable teenagers to make intelligent decisions about their overall health, while still advocating that abstinence is the only straight method to prevent pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases (Wirthman).Not only does comprehensive education provide insight to multiple sex-health topics, it also stresses the sizeableness of delaying sexual behaviors. To the disbelief of abstinence-only supporters, studies show that students that are taught comprehensive sex education are no more likely to be infected with sexually transmitted diseases, than those taught only about abstinence. Also contrary to pro-abstinence belief, those that are taught a more comprehensive approach have a broken iner risk of becoming pregnant teenage rs (Stanger). peerless study revealed that of those who are taught more comprehensively, 40% waited to have sex and more than 60% used protection (Wirthman). It is transparent that the more educated students are about the risks associated with sexual activity, the better decisions they make. A recent survey revealed that 38% of teenagers are more influenced by their parents regarding their decisions about sex (Teens). As stated by Emily Pettus, some legislators argue that sex education, including contraception and condoms, should be taught at home, not by the education system (Pettus). This is also where much of the debate is centered.However, teenagers typically do not open up to their parents about sexual activity and many parents tend to drop their heads in the sand and act like it is not happening with their children. frequently times, parents and teenagers are unsure about how to demonstrate the somewhat awkward subject of sex, so they do not talk about it at all. Therefore , education is often left up to teenagers peers and other typically inaccurate sources. One study revealed that nearly 90% of young people think if they could have open conversations with their parents about sex, it would be easier to postpone sexual activity.Also, nearly 80% of parents wish their kids would talk to them about sex so that they can provide them with the proper resources to protect themselves (Teens). Kathrin Stanger, professor at the University of Georgia states, If teens dont learn about human reproduction, including safe sexual health practices to prevent unintended pregnancies and STDs, and how to plan their reproductive adult life in school, accordingly when should they learn it, and from whom? (Stanger).Parents, along with the education system, can provide accurate, age-appropriate information to teenagers to help empower them to make healthy, responsible choices however, when both of these options fall short, teenagers often unit of ammunition to the media a s a source of education. Many critics often accuse the media of promoting teenage pregnancy, and even glamorizing it. However, little thought is given as to what the benefit of these shows aptitude be. The more teens are watching, the more producers are showing. Nevertheless, there might be some avails to the influence media has on its young viewers, especially regarding pregnancy (Suellentrop).Although some parents believe the media creates a false sense of reality by glorifying teenage pregnancy, they often fail to realize that such television shows can in reality help bridge the conversation gap between them and their children. Two of the television shows popular amongst high school students are MTVs Teen florists chrysanthemum and 16 and Pregnant. Both are reality shows that follow several young girls and their daily struggles as pregnant teenagers and young parents. A recent study by The National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy revealed interesting results when they asked teenagers their thoughts about such shows.The results revealed a surprising 40% talked to a parent about the show after watching and most concur that becoming teenage parents would have an overall negative impact on their lives (Suellentrop). If watching these episodes results in teenagers talking to their parents about sex, then ultimately it can be a positive influence, not only by eyesight the struggles that young parents face, but by giving parents and teenagers an opportunity to openly discuss their views and opinions about sex and relationships.Research shows that episodes such as these can be used in a positive manner to teach young people about the risks of becoming pregnant and how their lives could change drastically. Also, it seems that teenagers are automatic to discuss these shows with their parents, allowing the opportunity to engage in educational conversations with their teenagers. Clearly, the media influences its viewers however, advantage can b e taken to properly inform todays youth of the risks of sexual behavior while presenting information in an allure way (Suellentrop). Although there has been a steady decline in the U. S. een birth rate, it remains higher than many other countries. Students are more educated and are therefore making more informed decisions about sex (Kann). How can we expect teenagers to make appropriate, well-informed decisions regarding their sexual health if we do not give them the proper education and factual information to do so? The statistics show that evidence-based sex education works, so why go against the grain? (Wirthman). According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, more teenagers are using birth control, which has help lead the way to a record low birthrate, and the numbers of hose using contraception keep rising. Also leading to the decline, is more effective sex education, according to Leslie Kantor, vice president of education for Planned Parenthood (Tulumello). Hopefully in the future, additional school districts will adopt a more comprehensive approach to their curriculums, as it is shown to be much more effective in reducing teenage pregnancy than abstinence-only education. Telling a teenager not to experiment is like a meteorologist saying there is a 50% chance of rain. You hope it does not rain however, you bring an umbrella just in case it does.As much as we would like to believe that teenagers will not have sex, it is likely that they will engage in some type of sexual behavior in high school and providing them with accurate, age-appropriate information is vital. Sexual education can come from many avenues, including parents, schools, and the media. Comprehensive sex education will not stop the occurrence of teenage pregnancy 100%, but by adequately educating teenagers on safe sex practices, and providing them with medically accurate information, todays youth are able make healthy, well-informed decisions regarding their sexual well being.